Our new issue is out now. Subscribe today!

The Uber Welfare State

At Columbia University, hungry students are encouraged to rely on the charity of their wealthy peers.

Students at Columbia University's 2012 commencement. Llee_wu / Flickr

Columbia University is very rich. Its endowment is worth over $9 billion and its total assets are over $16 billion. Its annual revenues are nearly $4 billion. The land alone on its thirty-two-acre main campus is probably worth close to a billion at current rates for Manhattan land — and that doesn’t include buildings on the land, the uptown medical campus, or other holdings throughout one of the world’s most expensive real-estate markets. And yet it has some students who are going hungry because they’re too poor.

But the enterprising leaders of the student government have an idea: an Uber-like app that will allow rich students to share meals with their poorer colleagues. In a mass campus-wide email sent out last week, Ben Makansi and Viv Ramakrishnan, respectively student body president and VP of policy (!), announced a “two-pronged initiative.” After an arresting opening line, “Yes, we actually did some shit,” the duo, who ran a “satirical campaign,” disclosed the twin prongs of their “pilot plan.”

The first is “Swipes, a mobile app,” that is “like Uber for meal-sharing.” It will match donations of spare swipes on their meal cards by flush students to those in need of swipes. And the second is an “Emergency Meal Fund, a peer-funded meal bank,” which is presumably like an Indiegogo for the hungry, though they don’t invoke the obvious metaphor. The hungry will be able to claim up to six meals a semester, donated by their richer peers, with “no questions asked.” Six meals a semester isn’t very many for people who are seriously short of cash.

Makansi and Ramakrishnan concede that their scheme, despite its dual prongs, is not the “be-all end-all solution to food insecurity on campus,” though they hope it will “make a substantive dent in the issue.” What’s striking is that no one is embarrassed by the patronizing grotesqueness of the arrangement.

This phenomenally well-endowed institution — not Harvard-rich, but richer than all but ten other universities in the country — can’t find it in its $9.2 billion heart to make sure its students don’t go hungry. (The 2014 return on its endowment, $1.4 billion, was only a bit smaller than Georgetown’s entire endowment.) Instead, it resorts to the sort of social entrepreneurship that is celebrated in its business school. That’s doing some shit indeed.